Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "ProxyUpdateType"


(Created page with "== Basics == There are three different interface scenarios that can be configured for every single Proxy Prop-erty * Master * Client * Bi-directional This Interface direction...")
 
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* Solve the conflict according the Timestamp information: the newest change wins agains the older one.
 
* Solve the conflict according the Timestamp information: the newest change wins agains the older one.
 
* Manual solve: mark the object and let the user solve the “problem”
 
* Manual solve: mark the object and let the user solve the “problem”
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Proxy]]
 +
* [[MetaProxy]]
 +
* [[ProxyMetaProperty]]

Revision as of 13:48, 16 January 2014

Basics

There are three different interface scenarios that can be configured for every single Proxy Prop-erty

  • Master
  • Client
  • Bi-directional

This Interface direction as well as the conflict solving mechanism must be configureable on the Relation between MetaProxy and ProxyMetaProperty.

Master

As the Proxy Property is defined as a Master, the value is always exported from UBIK. The value will never be imported. Changes from the external system will always be discarded.

Client

As the Proxy Property is defined as a Client, the value is always be updated during an import from the 3rd party system. The value will never be exported. Changes in UBIK will always be dis-carded.

Bi-Directional

As the Proxy Property is defined as export/import “Bi-Directional” the Proxy supports both, exporting and importing the Property value. During the processing conflicts must be recog-nized. A conflict is as the property was changed in UBIK AND in the external system. There are two different Conflict scenarios:

  • Solve the conflict according the Timestamp information: the newest change wins agains the older one.
  • Manual solve: mark the object and let the user solve the “problem”

See also