Difference between revisions of "HowTo:Configure Dynamic Selective Lists"

Preconditions

We assume you're familiar with MetaClasses, Classifications, and Abstract Content Management (ACM). In other words, you should be capable of creating a small mobile app with UBIK^® before you start with this tutorial.

Goal 1: Create a new Dynamic Selective List

Basic definition

First, we'll define the dynamic selective list without specifying any details.

• Create a new MetaClass deriving from the Query meta class. We'll call this new meta class "MC_DYN_SL".
• Assign the Dynamic Selective List Classification to it.
• Create a new instance of this new meta class. In this tutorial, we shall be referring to it by the name of "DynSL".

There will be more to do so the DynSL actually works later, but we'll come to that when it is time.

Getting it to the mobile client

Next, we want to make sure the mobile client receives your DynSL.

• Create a new query scope for the DynSL. Let's call it "QCS_DYN_SL" for example.
• Assign the DynSL instance to the new query scope.
• Add the Offline Query Classification to the scope.
• Add the Dynamic Selective List Classification to your scope as well.
• Add the "QCS_DYN_SL" to the scope list of your ACM context.
• Add the "DynSL" instance to the infrastructure list of your ACM context.

Because every Dynamic Selective List is also an Offline Query technically, it's highly recommended to read the details about offline query first.

Goal 2: Create items for the Dynamic Selective List

Basic definition

For our DynSL, we also need items that can be selected on the target property. We'll define them now, without specifying details yet.

• Create a meta class "MC_DYN_SL_ITEM", deriving from "NAMEDBASECLASS", so it has meta properties for name and description.
• For all possible values your dynamic selective list should provide, create an instance. For example, we could name them "Hugo", "Denise", and "Bob".

We'll have to add more data to our items, but we'll do that later.

Getting them to the mobile client

Now, let's ship the items to the mobile client.

• Create a meta class scope "MCS_DYN_SL_ITEM" for the item meta class ("MC_DYN_SL_ITEM").
• Add the scope to the list of all scopes of your ACM context.
• Also, add all items ("Denise", "Bob", and "Hugo") to the infrastructure list of your ACM context. You may use a query for that, of course.

Goal 3: Use the Dynamic Selective List on a target Meta Property

Basic definition

Again, the first step will be to define the model and data.

• Create a meta class "MC_WITH_DYN_SL" containing a meta property "LNK_WITH_DYN_SL".
• Make sure the meta property has the property type "Guid", meaning it can link to another object (i.e., a dynamic selective item).
• Create an instance of "MC_WITH_DYN_SL". It shall be called "InstanceWithDynSL".

Getting it to the mobile client

This is the part where we tell the client that the DynSL should be used for our link property.

• First, we need a scope for our target object. Create a meta class scope "MCS_WITH_DYN_SL".
• Add the scope to the list of all scopes of your ACM context.
• Also add the "LNK_WITH_DYN_SL" meta property to the scope.
• Make that scoped meta property editable (lock status "writable" and visibility "visible").
• Now we assign the DynSL: Set the "FilterQuery" property of the scoped meta property to "QCS_DYN_SL", which is the query scope we created earlier for our DynSL.
• The instance ("InstanceWithDynSL") must also be available on the client, somewhere in the content hierarchy. We'll deal with that later.

Goal 4: Define a dependency property

If we want a dynamic set of options to select from, we also need a dependency telling us which options should be available. In our example, "Bob", "Denise", and "Hugo" are all options. But let's say, as an arbitrary example, for our target object "InstanceWithDynSL", only "Denise" and "Bob" should be selectable values of the property "LNK_WITH_DYN_SL".

In any case, we require somebody to blame for this decision. After all, "Hugo" could feel left out and send a complaint to management, so we better have a scape goat. The goal of this section is to create something so we can justify why "Denise" and "Bob" can be possible values, but "Hugo" isn't.

Our line of argumentation will be: the department has a specific requirement for items to be selectable, so the department rules are the reason only "Denise" and "Bob" are qualified.

Basic definition

• First, we need a new meta class "MC_DEPARTMENT".
• Add a meta property "MP_REQUIREMENT" to the scape goat class.
• You can use any property type for that, but we'll just stick to "String" for this example.
• Now let's create a specific department with concrete qualification requirements: Create an instance "Department Alpha", because that sounds cool and important.
• "Department Alpha" has the highest standards for its items, so please enter the value "A" for the property "MP_REQUIREMENT" of "Department Alpha". We'll imagine "A" stands for "Security clearance level 'Angel'". But this is top secret.

Now we have to assign a security clearance level to our items. We want "Denise" and "Bob" to have security clearance "A", but "Hugo" should just have clearance "B".

• This means we require a new meta property "MP_SECURITY_CLEARANCE" on our item meta class! Add such a meta property to "MC_DYN_SL_ITEM".
• After you've added the new meta property, we can open the items in a bulk editor and enter the value "A" for "Bob" and "Denise", and "B" for "Hugo".

Getting it to the mobile client

• Since our items have gained a security clearance now, we also have to send it to the client. Add the new meta property to the scope "MCS_DYN_SL_ITEM".
• Of course, we also want to have our department on the client. Also, the department should be a root object, and our test object "InstanceWithDynSL" should be below that department in the content hierarchy on the client. We trust you know how to achieve this!

So now, we've created a dependency property telling us why some of our items can be selected and some of them can't. But something's still missing. We'll get to that in a moment.

The dependency object specifying the value influencing the selectable items must be either the target object (the one with the DynSL property), or anywhere above it in the hierarchy.

Goal 5: Add a criterion to connect the dots

We know why "Denise" and "Bob" can be selected for "InstanceWithDynSL". They have the right security clearance after all, which is required by the department "Department Alpha", which is the department above "InstanceWithDynSL". But we haven't documented that yet! And if it isn't written down, it doesn't exist. Quick, let's define this rule before "Hugo" gets to file a complaint.

Basic definition

What we need, is a so-called Dynamic Selective List Criterion. It links the department's requirement to the security clearance of our items, in a way the mobile client understands it.

• Create a new meta class "MC_DYN_SL_CRITERION".
• Add the Dynamic Selective List Criterion Classification to it and implement all the meta properties it requires.
• Now create an instance of the criterion meta class. We'll call it "SecurityClearanceCriterion".
• Now open the bulk editor for our new meta class so we can configure the details of our criterion:
  • Set the DYNAMIC_SELECTIVE_LIST property to our "DynSL".
  • Set the IS_MULTI_VALUE_STRING to False for now.
  • The DEPENDENCY_CLASS should be our "MC_DEPARTMENT".
  • The DEPENDENCY_PROPERTY_NAME is "MP_REQUIREMENT".
  • QUERY_CRITERION_NAME should be set to "MP_SECURITY_CLEARANCE".
  • IGNORE_NULL can be set to False for now.

Getting it to the mobile client

Now that we have documented our security clearance criterion, we just have to tell the client.

• For this purpose, create a meta class scope "MCS_DYN_SL_CRITERION" for the meta class "MC_DYN_SL_CRITERION".
• All the meta properties described above should also be added to the scope.
• Add the scope to the list of all scopes of your ACM context.
• Add the criterion instance ("SecurityClearanceCriterion") to the list of infrastructure objects.
• The new criterion must also be reflected on the dynamic selective list scope, because we need it for the offline query aspect of this feature: Add the meta property "MP_SECURITY_CLEARANCE" to the DynSL scope "QCS_DYN_SL".

Multiple criteria with different dependencies are supported. It is also possible to omit the dependency class restriction, so the closest object with the dependency property (ignoring the meta class) is used as dependency.

A criterion property (like "MP_SECURITY_CLEARANCE" in our example) on the Dynamic Selective Items also has to appear on the Dynamic Selective List scope, because technically, an offline query is used in the background.

Releasing the ACM meta definitions

Now that we have configured everything, the ACM meta definitions can be released and the web service can be restarted.

Test

Connect the mobile client to the web service you're using and log in. We want to see a root object "Department Alpha" and below it, the "InstanceWithDynSL". On the latter, you should be able to edit the property "LNK_WITH_DYN_SL". A selection dialog should appear, suggesting "Denise" and "Bob", but not "Hugo".

Bonus: Multi-value criterion

In our example, it turns out "Hugo" has connections to the top level management. He talks them into lowering the security clearance of "Department Alpha" to "B", hence allowing him to be on the team. But since "A" is higher than "B", "Denise" and "Bob" should also be cleared for access. How do we include both of them?

This can be done in two steps:

• Change the security clearance requirement ("MP_REQUIREMENT") of "Department Alpha" to "A;B".
• Change the IS_MULTI_VALUE_STRING property of the "SecurityClearanceCriterion" to True.

Now, after releasing the ACM meta definitions and restarting the web service, all items with security clearance levels "A" and "B" are possible choices and all of them should appear when editing "InstanceWithDynSL"'s property "LNK_WITH_DYN_SL".

More possibilities

You can configure Dynamic Selective Lists to allow much more complex scenarios. For example, you can remove the restriction for the dependency class on the criterion. You can define the target object as the dependency object, too, so it depends on a different property of itself. You can even specify multiple criteria, potentially with different dependency objects. It is also possible to define multiple properties with dynamic selective lists depending on each other successively.